Abstract
The innovative dynamics of a region largely depends on existing actors and their connectivity, so the resilience of a particular innovation system can be analysed through the study innovation networks. Starting from the Algarve’s case study, this analysis uses methods of social network structural analysis to map actors and centralities regarding cooperation and innovation in regional development. The chapter uses data collected through web content mining, starting from the list of organizations that have benefited from public support to innovation. The mapping of the innovation network in the Algarve is compared to theoretical models of resilient networks with the statistical indicators of hierarchy and homophily. The results facilitate the identification of gatekeepers, clusters of activities and constraints and potentialities to the enhancement of the regional entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable (EIS) ecosystem. This approach has high potential for replication in other regions. The chapter concludes with policy implications for the EIS ecosystem’s resilience and dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., & Autio, E. (2015). Global entrepreneurship index 2015. Washington, DC: The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute.
Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2012). Resilience as a framework for urbanism and recovery. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 6(2), 37–41.
Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481.
Boschma, R., & Pinto, H. (2015). Resilient territories. In H. Pinto (Ed.), Resilient territories innovation and creativity for new modes of regional development. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge SP.
Breiger, R. (2004). The analysis of social networks. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis. India: Sage Publications.
Brekke, T. (2015). Entrepreneurship and path dependency in regional development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(3–4), 202–218.
Burt, R. (1995). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 22, pp. 345–423). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and quadruple helix: Toward a 21st-century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.
Christopherson, S., Michie, J., & Tyler, P. (2010). Regional resilience: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 3(1), 3–10.
Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.
Cohen, B., Almirall, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5–13.
Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2013). Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience? Journal of Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt006.
Davies, S. (2011). Regional resilience in the 2008-2010 downturn: Comparative evidence from European countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr019.
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., & Mcevoy, D. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in northern Afghanistan urban resilience: What does it mean in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333.
Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2010). Towards the resilient region ?: Policy activism and peripheral region, SERC Discussion Papers, SERCDP0053. London: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science.
Foster, G., & Shimizu, C. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics, Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013, World Economic Forum.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(69), 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
Hage, J., Mote, J. E., & Jordan, G. B. (2013). Ideas, innovations, and networks: A new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge. Policy Sciences, 46, 199–216.
Hamdouch, A., & Depret, M. (2012). Mondialisation et résilience des territoires. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Isenberg, D. J. (2011). “The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship”, the Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem project. Massachusetts: Babson College.
Jackson M (2010). An overview of social networks and economic applications, Benhabib J, A Bisin and M Jackson Handbook of Social Economics, New York, Elsevier Science & Technology, 511–585.
Jackson, B. D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? Washington, DC. http://erc-assoc.org/sites/default/files/topics/policy_studies/DJackson_Innovation Ecosystem_03-15-11.pdf
Karlsson, C. (2011). Clusters, networks and creativity. In D. E. Andersson, Å. E. Andersson, & C. Mellander (Eds.), Handbook of creative cities (pp. 85–114). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marsden, P. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 8–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2014). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015.
Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2015). Local growth evolutions: Recession, resilience and recovery. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv012.
Morrison, E. (2013). Universities as anchors for regional innovation ecosystems. http://www.edmorrison.com/universities-as-anchors-for-regionalinnovationecosystems/
Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004.
Phillips, F. (2006). Social culture and high tech economic development: The technopolis columns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinto, H., & Pereira, T. S. (2012). Institucionalização da Transferência de Conhecimento: Políticas Públicas e Formação de Actores-Rede na Universidade Portuguesa, Actas do VII Congresso da APS, http://www.aps.pt/vii_congresso/papers/finais/PAP1260_ed.pdf
Pinto, H., & Pereira, T. S. (2014). Resiliência dos sistemas de inovação face à turbulência económica, Oficinas do CES, 418. http://www.ces.uc.pt/publicacoes/oficina/ficheiros/11157_Oficina_do_CES_418.pdf
Pinto, H., Guerreiro, J., & Uyarra, E. (2012). Diversidades de Sistemas de Inovação e Implicações nas Políticas Regionais: Comparação das Regiões do Algarve e da Andaluzia. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais 29, 3–14. http://www.apdr.pt/siterper/numeros/RPER29/29.1.pdf
Pinto, H., Noronha, M. T., & Faustino, C. (2015). Knowledge and cooperation determinants of innovation networks. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 20(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000100007.
Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743.
Rutten, R., Westlund, H., & Boekema, F. (2010). The spatial dimension of social capital. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003701381.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). Sage Publishers: Great Britain.
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504.
Simatupang, T. M., Schwab, A., & Lantu, D. C. (2015). Building sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389–398.
Simmie, J. (2014). Regional economic resilience: A Schumpeterian perspective. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-014-0274-y.
Simmie, J., & Martin, R. L. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 27–43.
Smith, M., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Rodrigues, E. M., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). (Version 1.0.1.167) [Software]. NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010. Disponível em http://www.smrfoundation.org
Spigel, B. (2015). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 1540–6520.
Ter Wal, A., & Boschma, R. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739–756.
Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2012). Reframing regional innovation systems: Evolution, complexity and public policy. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development (pp. 146–163). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, X., Ding, L., & Chen, X. (2014). Interaction of open innovation and business ecosystem. International Journal Services Science Technology, 7(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2014.7.1.05.
Acknowledgements
Hugo Pinto benefits from the financial support from FCT – Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (SFRH/BPD/84038/2012). The authors are thankful to CCDR Algarve for the availability of data. They also recognize the support of Daniela Mendes, Silvia Dragomir and Jorge André Guerreiro (research internships) in the preparation of material for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, H., Nogueira, C. (2018). Mapping an Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystem Using Social Network Analysis: An Exploratory Approach of Publicly Funded Innovative Project Data. In: Leitão, J., Alves, H., Krueger, N., Park, J. (eds) Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems. Applying Quality of Life Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71013-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71014-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)